Who will be controlling our food?
What does “The Bill Gates Foundation”, “The Rockefeller Foundation”, the Antarctic, a seed that self destructs called the “Terminator” and one called the “Traitor”(GMO’s), The Green Revolution, The World Bank and Third World countries overseen by those who not only control the finance of bio-engineering of plants, Population Control and Family Planning, have in common?
How about a “Doomsday Seed Vault” — you simply MUST read this eye opener of an article. It reads like a sci-fi. Probably one of the most scariest articles I have read in a long time!
Rev 6:5-6 When he opened the third seal, I heard the third living creature say, “Come!” And I looked, and behold, a black horse! And its rider had a pair of scales in his hand. And I heard what seemed to be a voice in the midst of the four living creatures, saying, “A quart of wheat for a denarius, and three quarts of barley for a denarius, and do not harm the oil and wine!”
Related post:
The protection of Paedophiles inside the Catholic Church
I Just found a website which is called “Catholic Sex Abuse” and it documents the covering up of Priests who commit sexual assault against children in Philadelphia…
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIATHOMAS MAGNUM, WILLIE MAGNUM, JAMES MONEY, DAVID PORTER, WALTER J. DALY, MARY LOGAN, ALFRED ROBERTS, NICHOLAS SIRAVO, BILL HENIS, JOAN MCCRANE, JOHN QUINN, JAMES SPOERL, JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA, HIS EMINENCE CARDINAL JUSTIN RIGALI, HIS EMINENCE CARDINAL ANTHONY BEVILACQUA AND ESTATE OF HIS EMINENCE CARDINAL JOHN KROL,
Defendants.
COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED28. Defendants also purposefully concealed the extent of the abuse within the archdiocese from the victims themselves through various immoral tactics, including evading victims who years later tried to report abuse and/or lying to victims about Defendants’ knowledge of the reported abusers’ sexually predatory history and/or the existence of numerous other victims. Id. at §III, V and VI, Appendix D.
29. Defendants concealed the criminal activities of the pedophile priests and their knowledge thereof in an effort to avoid scandal, criminal and civil lawsuits, and financial repercussions for the purpose of avoiding claims and in order to avoid such liability sought to conceal said activities for a sufficient period of time so as to invoke the statute of limitations as a defense to any civil claims ultimately pursued. Id. at §I, III and VI, Appendix D.
30. The Defendants failed to remove known pedophile priests from active duty, or to even reprimand or discipline them in any way, and instead transferred the known and often self-admitted pedophiles from parish to parish. Id. at §I, II, III, IV, V and VI, Appendices B and D.
31. By refusing to take appropriate disciplinary measures and instead transferring the pedophile priests to new and unsuspecting parishes, Defendants greatly expanded the number of minor victims that the pedophile priests came into contact with, and thereby effectively facilitated and granted their consent to the pedophile priests’ ongoing criminal activities. Id. at §II.
